| 1 |
Attitude towards English and ESP
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.aelfe.org/documents/text6-Gonzalez.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
The relationship between generative grammar and (relevancetheoretic) pragmatics
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/grammarprags.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Organizational-Pedagogical Conditions to Form the Foreign Competence in Students with the Features of Linguistic Giftedness
|
|
|
|
In: http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/download/44768/24392/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
SHORT REPORT Do cultural and linguistic a
|
|
In: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490725/pdf/1747-597X-7-34.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Citation as a Stimulus to Boost Students ’ Communication Skills at the English
|
|
|
|
In: http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/42404/23166/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
THE COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE: A NEW APPROACH
|
|
In: http://www.afahc.ro/revista/nr_2_2009/art_lesenciuc.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING THE OFFICE OF MINORITY HEALTH
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ishib.org/journal/18-3s3/ethn-18-03-373.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Language, Cognition, and the Right Hemisphere A Response to
|
|
In: http://web.nsboro.k12.ma.us/algonquin/faculty/socialstudiesteachers/smith/documents/UnitsCognitionandBiologicalBasesofBehavior.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
1 Nativism: In Defense of the Representational Interpretation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.arts.ryerson.ca/philosophy/docs/GCJP.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
More Individual Differences in Language Attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers?
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.cogling.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/More%20individual%20differences.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
This paper provides experimental evidence suggesting that there are considerable differences in native language attainment, and that these are at least partially attributable to individual speakers’ experience. Experiment 1 tested high academic attainment (hereafter, HAA) and low academic attainment (LAA) participants ' comprehension using a sentence-picture matching task. Test sentences comprised passives and two variants of the universal quantification construction. Active constructions were used as control. HAA participants performed at ceiling on all conditions; LAA participants performed at ceiling only on actives. As predicted by usage-based accounts, the order of difficulty of the four sentence types mirrored their frequency. Experiment 2 tested whether the less educated participants ’ difficulties with these constructions are attributable to insufficient experience. After a screening test, low scoring participants were randomly assigned to two training groups. The passive training group were given a short training session on the passive construction; and the quantifier training group were trained on sentences with quantifiers. A series of post-training tests show that perfommance on the trained construction improved dramatically, and that the effect was long lasting.
|
|
Keyword:
English passive construction; How; Individual differences; Linguistic competence; Linguistic performance 1 More Individual Differences in Language Attainment; Sentence comprehension; Universal quantification
|
|
URL: http://www.cogling.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/More%20individual%20differences.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.215.4165
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
